Monday, June 26, 2006

ROSS V CAMERON-Pt 2 The Voice of Reason?

The delectable designer as usual could not resist the urge to throw her hat in the ring on the above subject, as noted from her email which I reproduce below.Of course the issue of stockings or indeed the lack of them is not unlikely to be a factor in play. Illuminating as usual, please read. By the way DD, lay off Mo, I loved that woman dearly and I can get very childish and vindictive when she's attacked.

Mr. K,

I had the enviable pleasure of being privy to the live taping of one of JR's show and have to say a lot of the reason that the guy comes out as a total nincompoop is in the editing.

Jools Holland was on that day and the two hours they bantered on set was reduced to a paltry fifteen minutes on the friday night show, we were laughing in the aisles at JR's quick witted retorts to an adequate opponent.

Who knows how the interview (Ross v Cameron) really went or what elements the BBC allowed us mere mortals to partake of, are we not forgetting that the show is about entertainment. Had Cameron not wanted the mickey taken he should have stayed with Paxman.

AND as for Mag's in stockings YES she does wear them, I distinctly remember an article in Drapers record where a hosiery manufacturer was supplying No. 10 with the offending articles. Some of the most unappetising thighs in history with boatraces to match have been known to sport the sexiest underwear, didn't Mo Mowlem refer to such on Room 101??? You never know Mag's just might have had a fabulous pair of pins and let her femininity remain hidden for only Dennis!


0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home